The Five Myths of Monovision Cor
The Five Myths of
Monovision Correction of Presbyopia: Myth #4
In this five-part series of EyeMatters, we are discussing the Five Myths
of Monovision Correction which are:
|
#1. Monovision is the best place
to start for emerging presbyopes
#2. Fitting
monovision takes less chair time than multifocal contact lenses
#3. Patients adapt to monovision more easily than to
multifocal contact lenses
#4. Multifocal lenses provide compromised visual
quality
#5. Patients won’t pay more for multifocal contact
lenses |
We have already dispelled
myths 1-3. In this edition, we will address Myth #4, Multifocal lenses
provide compromised visual quality.
Of all the myths about
monovision and multifocal correction this one couldn’t be further from the
truth. As eye care professionals, one of our top goals is to provide patients
with the best vision correction options available to them. With that goal in
mind, it is critical to assess the true advantages of multifocal contact lens
correction over monovision contact lenses. Table 1 delineates the critical differences in visual quality of the
leading multifocal design compared to monovision:
Table 1

Certainly monovision
correction provides good near and distance visual acuity, but as shown in the
Table 1, it falls short when the full range of factors impacting visual
performance are considered. The multifocal design delivers a natural and
uncompromised visual experience. Patient satisfaction isn’t solely measured on
a Snellen chart, so having the advanced multifocal option is great for patients.
You can prove it to yourself just by taking a patient newly fit with multifocal
lenses out to your reception area to look at a computer screen, magazines or out
across the room.
Based on the established success of the Bausch & Lomb Multi-focal
optical design, PureVision Multi-Focal lenses are shown to deliver the vision
and comfort patients have come to expect. It’s also the only silicone hydrogel
multifocal lens sold, providing high oxygen transmissibility for healthy, white
eyes and long wearing times. The overall result is more satisfied patients as
shown in the Likert-scale study conducted with 220 patients summarized in Chart
1.
Chart 1

As shown in Chart 2, the practitioners for these patients agree PureVision
Multi-Focal lenses offer excellent visual performance at distance, intermediate,
and near vision ranges.1 The quality of vision throughout the entire viewing
range is an important contributor to the visual quality and patient satisfaction
that PureVision Multi-Focal lenses achieve.
Chart 2

Ultimately, the Bausch & Lomb Multi-Focal lens design is
shown to deliver excellent visual quality from both the patient and practitioner
perspectives. Even in a comparison study of satisfied monovision patients,
Bausch & Lomb Multi-Focal lenses were preferred 81% for near and far vision and
94% for overall performance.2
For most of us, this type of patient satisfaction is the ultimate measure of
overall visual quality. It is also the ultimate arbiter of whether your patients
will succeed and thrive with a particular correction.
For expert fitting advice
watch the brief video at this link
http://www.bausch.com/multifocalfittingtips.
We will address the 5th
and final myth, “Patients won’t pay more for multi-focal lenses”, in the next
edition of EyeMatters. If you miss any editions of this series you can go
to our newsletter archives at
http://www.eyematters.com/archive.asp.
Sincerely,
Mike Pier, OD
Director, Professional Relations and Practitioner Education
1. 2005 Bausch & Lomb. A
220-patient study to evaluate performance of PureVision Multi-Focal contact
lenses. After 2 weeks of wear practitioners and patients completed forced-choice
questionnaires. Data
for “Agree” is a combination of responses for: Completely Agree, Agree, and
Somewhat Agree. 2.
This Comparison Study was an
assessment of comfort, near and distance acuity, handling, overall wearing
experience of Bausch & Lomb® SofLens® Multi-Focal contact lenses on new and
current contact lens wearers. Participating practices were asked to fit current
presbyopic patients (who are not presently wearing SofLens Multi-Focal) with
SofLens Multi-Focal contact lenses for a one week period. Then a comparative
evaluation took place from both patient and doctor perspectives, concluding with
a choice of which lens experience was preferred overall. A total of 275 patients
completed the study (185 happy with their current lens, 90 unhappy with their
current lens) across 5 locations.
â/ä
denote trademarks of Bausch & Lomb Incorporated. © Bausch & Lomb Incorporated.
|